Rank #8 by monthly deposit volume · November 2026
1WIN review
Large by volume, thin on published detail, and the only operator here that verifies on the crypto path as well.
#8by volume
1WIN quick facts
November 2026 data · last verified 2026-11-02
- Established
- 2018
- Operator entity
- 1win N.V.
- License authority
- Curacao
- License number
- Not confirmed
- Verify at
- Yes, on the authority's public register
- KYC tier
- Full KYC
- KYC on crypto deposit
- Verification used
- Fiat on-ramp
- Yes, verification required
- Supported crypto
- BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, LTC, TRX, DOGE
- Originals RTP
- Not published
- Deposit volume, November 2026
- ~$130M
- Restricted countries
- United States, United Kingdom, Netherlands, France
- Last verified
- 2026-11-02
Watchlist. Compliance review not complete. Operator profile and market focus differ materially from the rest of the tracked set, and no Originals RTP is published. How standing works
1WIN promo code
We have no referral link for 1WIN, so there is nothing to attach and nothing for us to earn either way.
If anyone sells you a 1WIN promo code, it is a scam. Codes are free when they exist at all.
Why it ranks here
Roughly $140M in tracked deposits, up 24%, eighth in the tracked ten. Deposit count rose 9%, so both more deposits and larger ones.
Who this is for
We are not in a position to recommend this operator to anyone yet, and we would rather say that plainly than write a profile that implies more confidence than we have.
1WIN operates a materially different model from the rest of this list, with a heavier fiat orientation and a different regional focus. Our compliance review is not complete.
KYC reality
Unlike the rest of the tracked set, verification is part of the standard flow rather than a threshold trigger. If you are here for the no KYC properties of crypto gambling, this is not the operator for that.
Deposits
Broad coin support alongside extensive fiat rails. The fiat side is a larger part of the product here than at any other operator in the set.
Withdrawals
We do not have a withdrawal performance picture we would stand behind. Nothing goes in this section until we do.
VIP and rewards
A loyalty structure exists. We have not reviewed its terms.
Games and Originals
A large library including in-house titles. 1WIN does not publish an Originals RTP figure that we could find on the operator site or in any independent audit, and we are not going to infer one.
History and ownership
We were not able to confirm the current operating entity or license number to a citable standard. Those fields are marked unverified rather than filled.
What the independent trackers say about 1WIN
Two sources with a published methodology, read on 2026-11-02. We refresh these monthly, because a rating quoted from last year is worse than no rating at all.
| Casino Guru safety index | Not retrievable at the time of checking |
| AskGamblers rating | 2.8 / 10, player score 9.7 / 10 |
| Complaints resolved | 141 of 173, average amount $507 |
| Operating entity | 1win N.V. |
| Licence | Could not verify to a citable standard |
Casino Guru weights its safety index on complaint volume, complaint value and terms analysis. AskGamblers weights on complaint resolution. Neither is our number and neither is a guarantee. We publish both because where they disagree, the disagreement is the information. We deliberately do not lead with Trustpilot: scores there are open to incentivised reviews in both directions, and for this sector that makes them the weakest of the three.
The heaviest complaint load in our set by a distance: 173 complaints on AskGamblers, 32 of them unresolved. The recurring shape is withdrawals held under review for days or weeks after KYC is complete, withdrawal methods hidden for individual accounts, and accounts blocked after verification with funds not released.
The good
Large deposit count, and deposits are credited quickly.
The part we would not look past
AskGamblers scores the operator 2.8 out of 10. We could not verify the operating entity or a licence number to our standard, and the operator has not responded to contact.
Does 1WIN pay the people who send it players?
An operator that stops paying its affiliates is usually running short of money or has decided that a counterparty cannot make it pay. Players are a weaker counterparty than affiliates, so this is a leading indicator worth checking and almost nobody publishes it.
We could not establish an affiliate payment record either way. The operator has also not responded to our own contact attempts, which is itself a data point about how it handles counterparties.
What we checked, and what we did not
Licence status read from the issuing authority where one is verifiable, the operating entity from company records, and the ratings above from Casino Guru and AskGamblers on 2026-11-02. Deposit volume comes from on-chain tracking, not from the operator.
Supported coins, withdrawal limits, KYC policy and published RTP are taken from the operator's own cashier, terms and help pages. We mark them as its claims because that is what they are.
Complaint patterns are read from the public complaint boards. They are anecdotal, angry players are over-represented, and a single report is never a fact here. A repeated shape across many reports is worth more than any individual one.
We have not deposited, played through or timed a withdrawal at this operator ourselves. Plenty of sites claim they have. When we do it, we will say so and show the transaction. Until then, treat any withdrawal time on this page as the operator's claim or a pattern in player reports, never as our measurement.
Support and payment routes
The practical questions are the same at every operator here, and the answers are the ones to check before you deposit rather than after. Is live chat staffed by someone who can escalate, or a bot that closes the ticket? Which coins and networks does the cashier actually settle, as opposed to list? Does a withdrawal clear automatically or sit in a manual review queue, and does that change above a threshold? Is there a named VIP contact above a certain level, and does that contact have authority over a payout?
We publish what the operator states and what players repeatedly report, and we mark which is which. What withdrawal behavior actually tells you
Risks
- Our compliance review of this operator is not complete. Treat the absence of findings on this page as an absence of research, not as a clean bill of health.
- No published Originals RTP.
- Operating entity and license number not independently confirmed.
- Deposit count fell 28% month on month, which is the sharpest transaction decline in the set.
Bottom line
It is in the ranking because the deposit volume is real and our ranking is by deposit volume. It is on the watchlist because we have not finished looking at it. We will complete the review and update this page. Until then, everything above is what we actually know, which is not much.
We do not currently have a link for this operator. Nothing is implied by that either way.
1WIN questions
Why is 1WIN's profile so short?
Because we have not completed our review. We would rather publish a thin page that says so than a full one padded with material we have not verified.
Does 1WIN require KYC?
Verification is part of the standard flow rather than a threshold trigger, on both the crypto and fiat paths. It is the only operator in our tracked set where that is the case.
Why is it ranked seventh then?
Because rank is deposit volume and nothing else. Standing is a separate axis, and 1WIN sits on the watchlist. Read the methodology page for why we keep those two things apart.
Gambling carries a negative expected return. Over enough bets the house edge wins by design, and no ranking on this site changes that. If it has stopped being a choice, free confidential help exists: Peluuri in Finland, Stödlinjen in Sweden, BZgA in Germany, and GamCare internationally.