Operator directory
TrustDice review
On-chain heritage, EOS and Bitcoin roots.
| Founded | 2018 |
| Licensing | Curacao |
| In our volume ranking | No. One of our picks this month, chosen editorially and not ranked by volume. |
| Last reviewed | 2026-08-18 |
TrustDice came out of the EOS gambling era and kept going after most of that generation disappeared. That survival is the interesting part of its history.
It retains more of the on-chain approach than most operators that made the same transition, alongside a conventional casino product and a faucet system that predates the current market entirely.
Eight years of continuous operation. Not large by current deposit volume, and not new either.
TrustDice promo code
There is no code to type. Our link carries the referral, so whatever welcome offer is running attaches to your account on signup.
We do not publish the bonus figure, because it changes faster than this page does and a stale number is worse than none. What is worth reading is the wagering requirement, which is where the value actually goes.
Affiliate link. We may earn commission if you sign up through it. It has no effect on this operator's rank, standing or anything else we publish. Full disclosure
If anyone sells you a TrustDice promo code, it is a scam. Codes are free when they exist at all.
What the independent trackers say about TrustDice
Two sources with a published methodology, read on 2026-11-02. We refresh these monthly, because a rating quoted from last year is worse than no rating at all.
| Casino Guru safety index | 3.2 / 10, Very low on 60,065 black points |
| AskGamblers rating | 8.4 / 10, player score 9.0 / 10 |
| Complaints resolved | 14 of 15, average amount $1,343 |
| Operating entity | Satoshi Gaming Group N.V. |
| Licence | Curacao Gaming Control Board |
Casino Guru weights its safety index on complaint volume, complaint value and terms analysis. AskGamblers weights on complaint resolution. Neither is our number and neither is a guarantee. We publish both because where they disagree, the disagreement is the information. We deliberately do not lead with Trustpilot: scores there are open to incentivised reviews in both directions, and for this sector that makes them the weakest of the three.
The two sources disagree sharply, and the complaint substance is the reason to look closely. AskGamblers lists seven complaints whose shape repeats: the player completes KYC, requests a withdrawal, and the withdrawal is marked confiscated and the account closed. Amounts include 0.22 BTC, 5,000 USDT, 1.22 ETH and GBP 1,800. All seven are recorded as resolved. Two further complaints concern responsible gambling: a one month self exclusion that was not honoured, and deposits accepted after the player reported a gambling problem.
The good
Eight years of continuous operation, a 9 out of 10 player score from 654 reviews, and 14 of 15 complaints resolved.
The part we would not look past
Casino Guru scores this operator 3.2 out of 10, labelled very low, on 60,065 black points. That is more than five times the next highest total on this site. The two self exclusion complaints are the part we would not look past.
Does TrustDice pay the people who send it players?
An operator that stops paying its affiliates is usually running short of money or has decided that a counterparty cannot make it pay. Players are a weaker counterparty than affiliates, so this is a leading indicator worth checking and almost nobody publishes it.
No affiliate payment record found either way.
What we checked, and what we did not
Licence status read from the issuing authority where one is verifiable, the operating entity from company records, and the ratings above from Casino Guru and AskGamblers on 2026-11-02. Deposit volume comes from on-chain tracking, not from the operator.
Supported coins, withdrawal limits, KYC policy and published RTP are taken from the operator's own cashier, terms and help pages. We mark them as its claims because that is what they are.
Complaint patterns are read from the public complaint boards. They are anecdotal, angry players are over-represented, and a single report is never a fact here. A repeated shape across many reports is worth more than any individual one.
We have not deposited, played through or timed a withdrawal at this operator ourselves. Plenty of sites claim they have. When we do it, we will say so and show the transaction. Until then, treat any withdrawal time on this page as the operator's claim or a pattern in player reports, never as our measurement.
What we have not published
No bonus figures. Promotional terms in this sector change monthly, and a welcome offer quoted from an old review is worse than no figure at all because it reads as current. Check the operator's own site for what is running today.
No score out of ten. A composite rating is unfalsifiable, which is exactly why paid affiliate sites use them. What we do instead
Before you deposit anywhere
- Check the license yourself rather than trusting a footer. How
- Read what the terms reserve on verification. Two minutes
- Keep on the casino only what you are actively playing.
- Understand that a small test withdrawal proves very little. Why
Affiliate link. We may earn commission if you sign up through it. It has no effect on anything we publish about this operator. Full disclosure
Gambling carries a negative expected return. Over enough bets the house edge wins by design, and no ranking on this site changes that. If it has stopped being a choice, free confidential help exists: Peluuri in Finland, Stödlinjen in Sweden, BZgA in Germany, and GamCare internationally.
Related
Full directory
Every operator outside the volume ranking.
The volume ranking
The five largest by tracked deposit volume, plus our picks.
Licensing
What each license actually gives you.